Wednesday, April 9, 2014

"After-Birth Abortion": Even More Absurd Than You Thought [CAPC]

Two years ago, many people were shocked by the publication of a medical ethics paper arguing for the permissibility of “after-birth abortion” (i.e. killing a healthy newborn) by two bioethicists, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva. Thankfully, no matter where people landed on the abortion issue, most everyone disagreed with Giubilini’s and Minerva’s conclusion. Still, new studies in baby cognition now cast doubt on a key assumption of their argument, which not only confirms the absurdity of their conclusion, but has the additional (and ironic) consequence of making their “ethical expression” unethical. Read the rest of my article over at Christ and Pop Culture.

1 comment:

  1. This is some great stuff James! I think you have a new fan.

    ReplyDelete

**PLEASE READ** Your comments are welcomed and encouraged, even if (and especially if) you disagree with my beliefs. However, if I deem your comment disrespectful or inappropriate, it will not be published. This is a blog for intellectual grown-ups who know how to give an argument and disagree respectfully. If you can't hang, then go somewhere else.